Not enough for this Jew-

Yeah, the debates, so let us just assume, for the time being, that you were/are unaware of the sad and hate filled history of the NOI movement, Nation of Islam, that is, and its leader, Louis Farrakhan.

You never heard of Google? And where is change in this situation? Are you really so naive? If so, you have no business running a car lot, much less the country. If you go to the Anti Defamation League's website, http://www.adl.org/special_reports/farrakhan_own_words2/farrakhan_own_words.asp

You can read this;
Do you know some of these satanic Jews have taken over BET?... Everything that we built, they have. The mind of Satan now is running the record industry, movie industry and television. And they make us look like we're the murders; we look like we're the gangsters, but we're punk stuff."
"Justifiable Homicide: Black Youth in Peril (Part 3)" speech at Mosque Maryam, 11/11/07

or this

As I said over 20 years ago, there will be no peace for Israel, because there can be no peace as long as that peace is based on lying, stealing, murder, and using God's name to shield a wicked, unjust practice that is not in harmony with the Will of God."
"Year-end Interview" with the Final Call, January 6, 2008

This is who you want to endorse you? If not, why are you so silent?
Where is the grand speech about change, and how he represents old hatred?

Waiting. . . .
Oh, what FRESH hell is this???? MSNBC reports-

Obama has been conducting a behind-the scenes offensive against Farrakhan and his endorsement. Obama met privately over the weekend in Toldeo, Ohio, with Jewish leaders, whom he sought to reassure over his support for Israel, NBC’s Aswini Anburajan reported Tuesday night.

What the Hell? Why are you dling this in secret? So your antisemite supporters will not know? So the Jews will be duped into believing that you support Israel?

You are anti CHANGE- holding closed door meetings about this kind of thing. . .

Here is the exchange from the NYT
The question stemmed from Obama's initial answer when NBC's Tim Russert asked, 'Do you accept the support of Louis Farrakhan?' Obama might have said, 'No.' But instead, he seemed to go out of his way to denounce some of Farrakhan's statements while not taking on Farrakhan himself (and even using Farrakhan's preferred honorific in the process). 'You know, I have been very clear in my denunciation of Minister Farrakhan's anti-Semitic comments,' Obama said. 'I think that they are unacceptable and reprehensible. I did not solicit this support. He expressed pride in an African-American who seems to be bringing the country together. I obviously can't censor him, but it is not support that I sought. And we're not doing anything, I assure you, formally or informally, with Minister Farrakhan.'
…After his answer, Russert asked again, just as directly, 'Do you reject his support?' Obama might have answered, 'Yes,' but instead tried his best to stay away from anything so definitive. 'Well, Tim, you know, I can't say to somebody that he can't say that he thinks I'm a good guy. You know, I — you know, I — I have been very clear in my denunciations of him and his past statements, and I think that indicates to the American people what my stance is on those comments.'
… Russert pressed a bit more, bringing up Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Obama's long-time pastor, whose magazine last year said that Farrakhan 'truly epitomized greatness.'.. 'Tim, I have to say I don't see a difference between denouncing and rejecting,' Obama said. 'If the word "reject" Sen. Clinton feels is stronger than the word "denounce," then I'm happy to concede the point, and I would reject and denounce.'
Is this a joke?? You have to ask why this is not enough?
For a man so good at whipping up a speech, he appears. . .struck dumb when faced with the conflict between support and morals. .

NOT a good sign!

Currently listening : Dark Passion Play By Nightwish Release date: 02 October, 2007